What brought us today is the comparative evaluation of two network set-top boxes. I have also had 2-3 years of experience with Internet set-top boxes, and there are also several boxes at home. Today will be compared with two more typical boxes, namely Mango Q2 and Skyworth's new box model H4401.
Why contrast?
Can you easily compare it? Then here's why you should compare the two boxes.
First of all, these two boxes are one of Skyworth's products. One is Haimeidi's cooperation with Mango TV. There is a good gene between the two, and the other is a product of innovation. Therefore, it can be considered as a PK that represents two levels.
Second, the software resources used by the two are also different. Skyworth Box has adopted its own resources, while Mango Q2 adopts Ali's resources. Skyworth is an old television factory, and Ali is an old player on the Internet. Therefore, it also represents the PK between the two industries.
In the end, Skyworth Box and Mango Q2 represent the development of boxes for the 15th and 16th generations, respectively.
Well, that's why it's time to put the two boxes together for comparison testing. Let’s go straight to the topic and see what kind of experience these two models can bring us.
Appearance contrast articles??
As a comparison test, first of all, let's look at the difference between the two from the appearance above.
Comparing the two boxes, we can see that the mango pod Q2 is relatively more traditional in terms of its design. This is not only reflected in the appearance of its regular antenna, but also in the remote control with many buttons. . Compared to the simple remote control of the Skyworth box, the Mango Q2's remote control is more traditional, including not only common function keys, but also number keys, and adjustment keys. Therefore, Skyworth Box is obviously more popular if it is judged by the appearance of light.
On the external interface, the two interfaces are basically the same, we did not see the USB interface at the end of the mango Q2 fuselage, and saw two USB ports on the side. In terms of the number of USB interfaces, the mango Q2 is slightly more scalable. However, the number of USB ports on the TV box is not as important as it can be. (Isn't there a sentence, I can not but you must have), but if you talk about the unity and beauty of the interface settings, it is clear that Skyworth box still has a little advantage.
Speaking of the power adapter, the Mango Q2 uses a 5V2A 3.5mm pinhole adapter, while the Skyworth box uses a 12V2A 3.5mm pinhole adapter. Therefore, the power consumption of the Skyworth box may be greater between the two. The pinhole power adapter was once lost, and when I went to prepare an adapter, I found that the 12V2A adapter in the pinhole adapter was much easier to buy than the 5V2A adapter.
??? System comparison articles???
After the appearance is finished, let's take a look at the contrast between the two on the system.
At the beginning of the interface, Skyworth Box and Q2 are completely two styles. Skyworth's images emphasize the beauty of artistic conception, and the overall feeling is natural and relaxed. People's mood is more peaceful. The performance of mango pods Q2 is more emphasis on the richness of content. The content contained on the homepage is much more than Skyworth Dimensions. As for the background, it is even more profound, and it also emphasizes the feeling of traditional TV. Therefore, if you want to compare the system homepage of the two, you will have to look at personal preferences.
Before the system came up, it was explained before. Skyworth Box uses its own system, while Mango Q2 is based on the product of Cloud OS. So the two are different in layout design. I prefer Skyworth's layout because it's more neat and orderly, while mango Q2 is more common.
In terms of resources, individuals feel that everyone actually does almost the same, but it is still relatively rich in mango Q2, after all, relying on the resources of the cloud OS platform. Second, I still prefer to watch TV programs, but unfortunately I don't find any app that can directly watch TV programs on Skyworth. Therefore, I can't use a USB flash drive to drag a TV player to Skyworth's box.
???
The above is a comparison test between Skyworth Box and Mango Q2. As mentioned at the beginning, the origins of the two boxes are too different. Although they are doing a product, the difference between the two is still very large. Through the appearance of contrast, we can clearly find that the network set-top box at least in the past two years, the appearance of progress or something.
And in the system internal cloud OS and Skyworth's own system can also see two different styles. In the richness of resources, Alibaba is a veteran of the domestic Internet companies, and the resource richness is obviously still much stronger than Skyworth.
Smart TV/box information can focus on smart TV information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing information, communication, TV boxes, smart TVs, smart TV software, etc. Answering questions.
Why contrast?
Can you easily compare it? Then here's why you should compare the two boxes.
First of all, these two boxes are one of Skyworth's products. One is Haimeidi's cooperation with Mango TV. There is a good gene between the two, and the other is a product of innovation. Therefore, it can be considered as a PK that represents two levels.
Second, the software resources used by the two are also different. Skyworth Box has adopted its own resources, while Mango Q2 adopts Ali's resources. Skyworth is an old television factory, and Ali is an old player on the Internet. Therefore, it also represents the PK between the two industries.
In the end, Skyworth Box and Mango Q2 represent the development of boxes for the 15th and 16th generations, respectively.
Well, that's why it's time to put the two boxes together for comparison testing. Let’s go straight to the topic and see what kind of experience these two models can bring us.
Appearance contrast articles??
As a comparison test, first of all, let's look at the difference between the two from the appearance above.
Comparing the two boxes, we can see that the mango pod Q2 is relatively more traditional in terms of its design. This is not only reflected in the appearance of its regular antenna, but also in the remote control with many buttons. . Compared to the simple remote control of the Skyworth box, the Mango Q2's remote control is more traditional, including not only common function keys, but also number keys, and adjustment keys. Therefore, Skyworth Box is obviously more popular if it is judged by the appearance of light.
On the external interface, the two interfaces are basically the same, we did not see the USB interface at the end of the mango Q2 fuselage, and saw two USB ports on the side. In terms of the number of USB interfaces, the mango Q2 is slightly more scalable. However, the number of USB ports on the TV box is not as important as it can be. (Isn't there a sentence, I can not but you must have), but if you talk about the unity and beauty of the interface settings, it is clear that Skyworth box still has a little advantage.
Speaking of the power adapter, the Mango Q2 uses a 5V2A 3.5mm pinhole adapter, while the Skyworth box uses a 12V2A 3.5mm pinhole adapter. Therefore, the power consumption of the Skyworth box may be greater between the two. The pinhole power adapter was once lost, and when I went to prepare an adapter, I found that the 12V2A adapter in the pinhole adapter was much easier to buy than the 5V2A adapter.
??? System comparison articles???
After the appearance is finished, let's take a look at the contrast between the two on the system.
At the beginning of the interface, Skyworth Box and Q2 are completely two styles. Skyworth's images emphasize the beauty of artistic conception, and the overall feeling is natural and relaxed. People's mood is more peaceful. The performance of mango pods Q2 is more emphasis on the richness of content. The content contained on the homepage is much more than Skyworth Dimensions. As for the background, it is even more profound, and it also emphasizes the feeling of traditional TV. Therefore, if you want to compare the system homepage of the two, you will have to look at personal preferences.
Before the system came up, it was explained before. Skyworth Box uses its own system, while Mango Q2 is based on the product of Cloud OS. So the two are different in layout design. I prefer Skyworth's layout because it's more neat and orderly, while mango Q2 is more common.
In terms of resources, individuals feel that everyone actually does almost the same, but it is still relatively rich in mango Q2, after all, relying on the resources of the cloud OS platform. Second, I still prefer to watch TV programs, but unfortunately I don't find any app that can directly watch TV programs on Skyworth. Therefore, I can't use a USB flash drive to drag a TV player to Skyworth's box.
???
The above is a comparison test between Skyworth Box and Mango Q2. As mentioned at the beginning, the origins of the two boxes are too different. Although they are doing a product, the difference between the two is still very large. Through the appearance of contrast, we can clearly find that the network set-top box at least in the past two years, the appearance of progress or something.
And in the system internal cloud OS and Skyworth's own system can also see two different styles. In the richness of resources, Alibaba is a veteran of the domestic Internet companies, and the resource richness is obviously still much stronger than Skyworth.
Smart TV/box information can focus on smart TV information network sofa butler (http://), China's influential TV box and smart TV website, providing information, communication, TV boxes, smart TVs, smart TV software, etc. Answering questions.
Sync and charge up to 30 tablets, phones, or other mobile device, without the need to connect to a computer
* Provides up to 5V, 2..1A (10Watts) of power per port, for charging battery-intensive devices such as an iPad
* Sync your devices using their file management software, such as Apple iTunes or Apple Configurator, supports USB 3.0 data transfer rates up to 5Gbps;
* Constructed of heavy-duty, steel housing. Build-in 5V 60A power supply with UL certification to keep the safe charges.
* Compatible with any USB powered mobile device,including iPads, Android tablets and e-book readers. Allows simultaneous synchronisation of all devices whilst connected.
* iTunes and Apple configurator enables you to sync your apps, media and usable content from your office, home or classroom. Our Intelligent charging allows you to charge multiple types of devices at the same time whilst ensuring connection stops automatically for each device once fully charged.
Multi-port hub 3.0,Hub Multi-Ports USB 3.0,Multi-Ports Industrial USB Hub,USB 3.0 HUB Multi-Ports
shenzhen ns-idae technology co.,ltd , https://www.szbestchargers.com