The engine is the heart of the car. A powerful and powerful heart vehicle can both have a good performance and extend the life of the car. At this stage, the two engines are in a state of equal potential. No one can completely overwhelm anyone, but as a new technology, the technology of turbocharging is better than natural inhalation.
The engine is the heart of the car. A powerful and powerful heart vehicle can both have a good performance and extend the life of the car. So the question is whether the car engine is naturally inhaled or turbocharged? Is the speed of the turbine fast and then fuel-efficient? Then the self-igniting and inhaling technology that is used in the old-fashioned car? The fuel consumption is then slower? Does the self-ignition inhalation slowly exit the current car market?
First of all, I have to admit that the turbine has almost been subtly integrated into everyone's life. Not only are more and more family cars starting to use turbocharging, but even insisting on extracting naturally aspirated engines at high speed (hereinafter referred to as “self†Ferrari, known for its "maximum horsepower", has also picked up the turbine and launched its first turbocharged model in the last two decades.
Acceleration: self-priming, turbo speed
Turbocharging, in general, increases engine intake by compressing engine exhaust. Under the premise of the same displacement as the naturally aspirated model, the turbocharger can greatly increase the power and torque of the engine. In terms of acceleration performance, the same displacement turbocharged engine is superior to the self-priming engine, and has obvious advantages in the open road section and high speed state. However, under low engine speed conditions, due to insufficient engine exhaust emissions required by the turbocharger, the role of the turbine is limited, and sometimes there is even a certain response lag, such as the throttle after the throttle is depressed. Go ahead. In contrast, the self-priming engine model accelerates more smoothly and linearly, especially at low speeds, which makes it more comfortable to drive.
Fuel consumption: the same displacement turbocharged engine and self-priming engine are actually not much different
When it comes to turbocharged engines, many people will mention that it is more fuel efficient. But in fact, compared with the same level of self-priming engines, the fuel-saving advantages of turbocharged engines are not very obvious. The reason why it is fuel-efficient is mainly because the turbocharged engine can obtain the output power of the self-priming engine with a larger displacement with a smaller displacement, and the turbocharged with a small displacement when the power level is similar. The engine is of course more fuel efficient.
Maintenance: the same difference is not big
If the owner does not deliberately choose better oil, the daily maintenance cost of most turbocharged engines will not be much different from that of self-priming engines, including maintenance intervals, maintenance items, and working hours. Many car owners care about the problem of replacing the turbine. With the maturity of the technology, the service life of turbochargers has been greatly extended, and most of them can accompany the life of the vehicle for life.
Naturally aspirated engines are relatively reliable and perfect, and turbocharging has advantages in various performance indicators. At this stage, the two engines are in a state of equal potential. No one can completely overwhelm anyone, but as a new technology, the technology of turbocharging is better than natural inhalation.Type1 Tethered Cable,16A Type1 Tethered Cable,32A Type1 Tethered Cable,Type 1 Tethered Charging Cable
Yangzhou JERI New Energy Co., Ltd. , https://www.jrevcharging.com