Recently, the Jinmen LED streetlight renovation project passed a fraud case, and the inspection was conducted overnight to discuss the Jinmen County Maintenance Engineering Director Dong Hanyao, Li’s director, and the white name contractor and manufacturer and staff of the procurement business. When handling the LED street lamp procurement case between 2010 and 2011, the suspect has already established the manufacturer, and since the purchase of products, the price of the selected purchasers, to the after-acceptance procedures, there is a suspicion of escort.
The inspection found that the purchase of LED street light products is inconsistent with the specifications required by the original standard. The most obvious is that the place of origin is "China", not the "Taiwan system" set in the procurement case. The initial estimate of the manufacturer is more than 7 million yuan (RMB). About 14.23 million yuan). Both the white name undertaker and the Lin surnamed manufacturer denied the fraud, and each of them was promised to pay NT$100,000, and the rest would be returned.
Liu Yingfang, the chief prosecutor, pointed out that there were more than 10 manufacturers who met the bidding qualifications at the beginning, and finally three of them participated in the price comparison according to the provisions of the “public supply contractâ€. The prosecution will continue to verify the current search materials and the confessions of the persons involved. A new wave of talks and the possibility of development.
It is understood that the original bidding amount of the LED street lamp procurement case in Jinmen County is 28 million yuan (about 5,691,900 yuan). In 2011, the company involved in the case of New Taipei City won the bid of 18 million yuan (about 3,659,100 yuan), and in 2014. The acceptance procedure is completed in the year.
The inspection found that the purchase of LED street light products is inconsistent with the specifications required by the original standard. The most obvious is that the place of origin is "China", not the "Taiwan system" set in the procurement case. The initial estimate of the manufacturer is more than 7 million yuan (RMB). About 14.23 million yuan). Both the white name undertaker and the Lin surnamed manufacturer denied the fraud, and each of them was promised to pay NT$100,000, and the rest would be returned.
Liu Yingfang, the chief prosecutor, pointed out that there were more than 10 manufacturers who met the bidding qualifications at the beginning, and finally three of them participated in the price comparison according to the provisions of the “public supply contractâ€. The prosecution will continue to verify the current search materials and the confessions of the persons involved. A new wave of talks and the possibility of development.
It is understood that the original bidding amount of the LED street lamp procurement case in Jinmen County is 28 million yuan (about 5,691,900 yuan). In 2011, the company involved in the case of New Taipei City won the bid of 18 million yuan (about 3,659,100 yuan), and in 2014. The acceptance procedure is completed in the year.
Guangzhou Winson Information Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.winsonintelligent.com